General AML|DNMT3A|TP53

Azacitidine in combination with nivolumab in relapsed AML patients

Immunotherapy may have a role in the treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), that’s according to Naval Daver from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre (MDACC) and colleagues. At the American Society of Hematology meeting at San Diego on the 6th of December 2016, Naval Daver gave a presentation on their phase1/1b study in which they later commented on their findings.

In this study, the authors investigated a novel combination of two new agents; azacitidine (AZA), a Hypomethylating Agent (HMA), and nivolumab, a PD-1 inhibitor. The rationale behind this study was to evaluate a mode of augmenting the anti-tumor and immunogenic effects of PD1 inhibitors whilst combatting the problem of resistance in HMA therapy. Fifty-one AML patients (median age = 69 years) were enrolled on the study.

The key results are:
  • 35 patients were evaluable for a response:
  • 6 (18%) achieved Complete Remission (CR)/  Complete Remission with Insufficient Recovery Counts (CRi)
  • 5(15%) had Hematologic Improvement (HI)
  • 9 (26%) patients had > 50% Bone Marrow (BM) blast reduction
  • 3(9%) achieved stable disease > 6 months, and 12 (34%) patients experienced disease progression
  • The median Overall Survival (OS) was 9.3 months (range, 1.8 – 14.3)
  • Four and eight week mortality rates were 0% and 6%, respectively
  • Grade 3/4 and Grade 2 immune mediated toxicities were observed in 7 (14%) and 6 (12%) pts, respectively
  • Patients who responded better to treatment had a significantly higher CD3 cells (P = 0.10), CD8+ T-cells (P = 0.02), and lower CD4+FoxP3+PD1+ T-regulatory (T-reg) cells (P = 0.01) at baseline, compared to non-responders
  • Significantly higher ratio of PD1+ CD8+ T-effector cells to PD1+CD4+FoxP3+ T-reg cells compared in responders compared to non-responders; P < 0.05

In summary, nivolumab/AZA combination resulted in a clinically significant increase in the median OS; Naval Daver stated that the combination compared favorably to historical survival with AZA-based salvage protocols in similar patients treated at MDACC. The authors concluded their study by stating that the full doses of AZA and nivolumab were tolerable and produced promising and durable response rates in relapsed AML patients with poor risk features.

Moreover, the results of this study have provided a rationale for the use of immunotherapy in the treatment of AML patients. Naval Daver, the lead author of this study, made the following statement about the group’s findings during their presentation: “We hope these immune checkpoint approaches will be an additional tool for improving outcomes in leukemia patients”.


Background: Blocking PD-1/PD-L1 pathways enhances anti-leukemia responses by unleashing T-cells in murine models of AML (Zhang et al, Blood 2009). PD-1 positive CD8 T-cells are increased in bone marrow (BM) of pts with AML (Daver et al, AACR 2016). PD1 inhibition alone demonstrated limited activity in AML (Berger et al, Clin Cancer Res 2008). Rational combination strategies to enhance the anti-tumor and immunogenic effects of PD1 inhibitors in AML are needed. AZA up-regulates PD-1 and PD-L1 in AML and the up-regulation of these genes has been associated with emergence of resistance to AZA (Yang et al., Leukemia 2013). These could be blocked with the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab.

Methods: Pts were eligible if they had AML and failed prior therapy, had adequate performance status (ECOG ² 2), and organ function. The first six pts received AZA 75mg/m2 Days 1-7 with nivolumab 3mg/kg on Day 1 and 14. Courses were repeated approximately every 4-5 weeks indefinitely. Only one of six pts had a dose limiting toxicity (grade 3 pneumonitis) and this dose was established as RP2D. 45 additional pts have been treated at the RP2D. Responses were evaluated at the end of 3 courses of therapy.

Results: 51 pts with a median age of 69 years (range, 45 – 90), secondary AML (55%), poor risk cytogenetics (47%), median number of prior regimens 2 (range, 1-7) have been enrolled. All 51 pts had baseline next generation sequencing and most frequently detected mutations included DNMT3A (n=12), TP53 (n=11), TET2 (N=9), ASXL1 (n=7), and RAS (n=7). 35 pts are evaluable for response: 6 (18%) achieved complete remission (CR)/ complete remission with insufficient recovery of counts (CRi) (3 CR, 3 CRi), 5 (15%) had hematologic improvement (HI), 9 (26%) had ³50% BM blast reduction, 3 pts (9%) had stable disease > 6 months, and 12 (34%) had progression. 16 pts are early for response assessment (<3 courses). The median number of courses to CR/CRi/HI was 3 (1 – 9). The CR/CRi/HI (n=11) have been durable with no relapses among pts who achieved CR/CRi/HI [CR duration; not reached (NR)]. The 4- and 8-week mortality were 0 and 6%, respectively. The median overall survival for the 35 evaluable pts was 9.3 months (range, 1.8 – 14.3) (Fig 1) and this compares favorably to historical survival with AZA-based salvage protocols in similar pts treated at MDACC.

Grade 3/4 and Grade 2 immune mediated toxicities were observed in 7 (14%) and 6 (12%) pts, respectively. These included 8 episodes of pneumonitis, 2 nephritis, 2 transaminitis, and 1 skin rash. 1 pt died from grade 4 pneumonitis/epiglottitis. In the remaining 12 cases the toxicities responded rapidly to steroids and all 12 pts were successfully rechallenged with nivolumab. Time to onset of toxicities ranged from 4 days to 3.5 months. Four pts were postSCT and one had a grade 3 flare of GVHD of the skin and gut.

Multicolor flow-cytometry studies and Mass-cytometry (CyTOF) studies are conducted by the Immunotherapy Platform on baseline and on-treatment BM aspirate (end of cycle 1, 2, 4, 8) and peripheral blood to assess the T-cell repertoire and expression of co-stimulatory receptors and ligands on T cell subsets and leukemic blasts respectively. Baseline and end of cycle 1 BM was evaluated on 25 of the 35 evaluable patients, including 6 responders (CR/CRi/HI) and 19 non-responders. Pts who achieved a CR/CRi/HI had a baseline higher live total CD3 (P=0.10), CD8+ T-cells (P=0.02), and lower live CD4+Foxp3+PD1+ T-regulatory (T-reg) cells (P=0.01) infiltrate in the BM (Figure 2). The ratio of PD1+CD8+ T-effector cells to PD1+CD4+Foxp3+ T-reg cells was significantly higher in the CR/CRi/HI pts vs non-responders (208.4 vs 8.91, P<0.05) in baseline BM. On IHC evaluation OX40 appeared to increase post-treatment in non-responders but not in responders.

Conclusion: Full dose AZA and nivolumab are tolerable and produce an encouraging response rate with durable responses in relapsed AML with poor risk features. Immune mediated toxicities occur and may be adequately managed with early recognition and systemic steroids. On prelim analysis responders had higher baseline BM CD8+ T-effectors, lower T-regs and higher PD1+CD8/ PD1+CD4+Foxp3+.

  1. Immunotherapy in AML: Nivolumab Combined with Azacitidine. ASH Clinical News. [Accessed 18th January 2017].
  2. Daver N, et al. Phase Ib/II study of nivolumab in combination with azacitidine (AZA) in patients (pts) with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Abstract #763. Presented at the ASH Annual Meeting and Exhibition, December 5, 2016; San Diego, CA.